top of page
  • AAF

The Impact Of Unfair Contract Terms On Franchise Businesses In Australia

unfair contract terms

Understanding Unfair Contract Terms In Franchise Agreements

Understanding unfair contract terms within franchise agreements in Australia is crucial for both franchisors and franchisees, as these can significantly impact the operations and success of a franchise business. Unfair contract terms are defined as clauses that cause a significant imbalance in the parties' rights and obligations under the contract to the detriment of one party. In franchise agreements, this often manifests through provisions that allow one party (usually the franchisor) to unilaterally alter terms or terminate contracts without reasonable cause, impose excessive penalties or restrict the other's ability to exit the agreement.

The Australian Consumer Law (ACL) protects against unfair contract terms by rendering them void and unenforceable. This means any term deemed unfair cannot be relied upon by either party. However, identifying these terms requires a careful examination of how they affect the contractual balance between franchisor and franchisee. The impact can range from financial strain due to unreasonable fees or costs, limited operational autonomy for the franchisee, to an overall lack of security in their business investment.

Understanding these dynamics is key for anyone involved in franchising in Australia to ensure their contracts promote fair dealings and sustainable business relationships.

Understanding Contracts and Their Terms

Nature of Contracts

When consumers purchase goods or services, they enter into a contract with the seller, which can be written or verbal. Even without a written document, a contract is formed based on the terms and conditions that outline the rights and responsibilities of each party. Legal enforceability ensures that if one party breaches the contract, the other can take legal action.

Terms and Conditions

Contracts include specific terms and conditions detailing each party's rights and responsibilities. Consumer rights are protected under the law and cannot be negated by contract terms. It's crucial to understand these terms before acceptance; consulting a lawyer if unclear is ideal.

Ending a Contract

Consumers can typically end a contract without charge if:

  • The business misrepresented goods, services or terms

  • A service failed to meet consumer guarantees

  • The consumer is within a cooling-off period

A cooling-off period allows consumers to change their minds within a set timeframe, especially in telemarketing or door-to-door sales.

Unfair Contract Terms

Laws protect consumers and small businesses from unfair terms in standard form contracts. Significant changes to these laws came into effect on 9 November 2023. From this date:

  • Proposing, using or relying on unfair contract terms is banned, with penalties for violations.

  • These changes impact standard form contracts made or renewed on or after 9 November 2023.

  • They also apply to any terms varied or added on or after 9 November 2023.

These updates aim to ensure fairer practices and better protection for consumers and small businesses.

Effect of Having an Unfair Contract Term

When a court or tribunal determines a contract term to be 'unfair,' it becomes void and non-binding on the involved parties. The remainder of the contract remains enforceable if it can function without the unfair term. If a party attempts to enforce an unfair term, it breaches the ACL, and the court can grant various remedies including:

  • Injunctions to prevent enforcement

  • Compensation

  • Orders for redress to non-party consumers or small businesses

  • Any other appropriate orders

Compliance with New Unfair Contract Term Legislation

The ACCC has identified several common clauses in Franchise Agreements that could be potential Unfair Contract Terms (UCTs):

  • Unilateral Variation Clauses: Terms allowing the Franchisor to vary terms unilaterally, such as changes to the operations manual or approved supplier list.

  • Withholding or Setting-off Payments: Terms permitting the Franchisor to withhold or set-off payments owed to the Franchisee if the Franchisee owes the Franchisor money.

  • Audit Power Clauses: Clauses granting the Franchisor the right to audit the Franchisee's business and require the Franchisee to cover the audit costs.

  • Restraint of Trade Clauses: Clauses restricting when and where a Franchisee can supply goods or services after the Franchise Agreement ends.

  • Termination Clauses: Clauses giving the Franchisor the right to terminate the Franchise Agreement with minimal or no limitations.

The Impact Of Unilateral Changes On Franchisee Rights

The impact of unilateral changes on franchisee rights within the Australian franchise sector underscores a significant area of concern, particularly in the context of unfair contract terms. Unilateral changes refer to modifications made by the franchisor to the franchise agreement without requiring consent from the franchisee. This practice can significantly tilt the balance of power in favour of franchisors, often at the expense of franchisee rights and interests.

One profound impact is on the operational stability and financial forecasting for franchisees. When franchisors reserve the right to make unilateral changes, it introduces a level of unpredictability for franchisees. This could relate to alterations in supply terms, fees, territory definitions or operational guidelines. Such unpredictability can undermine business planning and investment decisions made by franchisees based on original contract terms.

Moreover, unilateral changes can erode trust between franchisors and their partners. When decisions are made without consultation or regard for their impact, it fosters an environment of uncertainty and tension. This not only affects current operations but can also deter potential entrepreneurs from entering into franchise agreements, fearing potential overreach by franchisors.

Legal Protection For Franchise Businesses In The Australian Franchise Industry

In Australia, the franchise industry operates under a comprehensive legal framework designed to safeguard participants from unfair contract terms, highlighting the country's commitment to fair business practices. Central to this protective shield is the Franchising Code of Conduct, which is enforced by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC). This mandatory industry code prescribes a range of obligations for franchisors, including the requirement to act in good faith, provide disclosure documents that are transparent, and offer dispute resolution mechanisms.

Moreover, amendments made to Australian Consumer Law have fortified these protections by explicitly banning unfair terms in standard form contracts. These legislative instruments work collectively to ensure that franchise agreements are balanced and just.

The legal structure not only mandates clear disclosure of financial and business matters but also imposes significant penalties for breaches of the code. This includes remedies such as contract voidance or modification if terms are deemed unconscionable or unfairly prejudicial towards one party. Through these measures, Australia strives to cultivate an equitable environment where franchise businesses can thrive without being undercut by oppressive contractual obligations.

legal protection

Challenges Faced By Franchisees Due To Unfair Contract Terms

In the context of franchise businesses in Australia, franchisees often encounter significant challenges due to unfair contract terms, which can severely impact their operations and profitability. These terms often manifest in various ways, including disproportionate fee structures, stringent operational restrictions, and unilateral termination clauses. Such conditions can lead to a power imbalance between the franchisor and franchisee, placing undue pressure on the latter.

One of the primary challenges is the financial strain imposed by exorbitant fees that may not correlate with the support or benefits received from the franchisor. This financial imbalance can stifle growth and innovation within the franchisee's business by limiting their investment capacity. Additionally, operational restrictions detailed in these contracts can severely limit franchisees' autonomy, preventing them from adapting to local market conditions or exploring cost-efficient methods of operation.

Moreover, unfair contract terms often include clauses that allow franchisors to terminate contracts unilaterally with minimal notice, leaving franchisees vulnerable to sudden loss of business and income. This threat looms large over franchisees, potentially discouraging them from voicing concerns or negotiating for fairer terms.

Together, these factors contribute to a challenging environment for franchisees operating under unfair contract terms in Australia. They underscore the need for greater legal protections and more balanced contractual relationships within the franchising sector.

Strategies For Addressing Unfair Contract Terms In Franchise Agreements

In addressing the pervasive issue of unfair contract terms within franchise agreements in Australia, several proactive strategies have been identified to ensure a more equitable business environment. Foremost among these is the empowerment of franchisees through education and awareness initiatives. By providing comprehensive training on legal rights and the nuances of contract law, franchisees are better equipped to identify and challenge exploitative terms.

Furthermore, leveraging collective bargaining power stands as a pivotal approach. Franchisees, by banding together, can negotiate more balanced terms that fairly distribute risks and benefits between franchisors and franchisees. This collective stance not only strengthens their negotiation position but also promotes a more cooperative relationship between both parties.

Another significant strategy involves regulatory intervention. The Australian government has taken steps to strengthen legislation around unfair contract terms, aiming to provide a safety net for smaller operators often at a disadvantage in negotiations. These laws enable closer scrutiny of franchise agreements and grant authorities the power to nullify any provisions deemed unjust.

Lastly, seeking legal counsel before entering into any agreement is crucial. Professional advice can help in understanding contractual obligations fully and ensuring that any agreement entered into is free from exploitative clauses. Together, these strategies offer a robust framework for mitigating the impact of unfair contract terms on franchise businesses in Australia.

reviewing franchise agreements

Are You Facing Challenges with Unfair Franchise Contract Terms? 

The Australian Association of Franchisees (AAF) is here to support you! By becoming a member, you'll gain access to expert advice, essential resources, and advocacy to protect your rights and enhance your business success. AAF offers invaluable assistance in navigating complex franchise agreements, ensuring fair treatment, and fostering a positive franchising environment.

Joining AAF means you’re not alone; you’ll be part of a community dedicated to promoting equitable business practices. Take the first step towards a stronger, more secure franchise journey. Become a member today and experience the benefits of robust support and representation.

20 views0 comments


bottom of page